We don’t think it’s justified to grant any such relaxation. These applications highlighted practices prevalent in some of the western countries wherein such relaxation is allowed. Similar relaxation was demanded for other festivals. Several interlocutory applications have been filed in this Court, wherein it was pleaded that restriction on bursting of firecrackers in the night should be removed during Diwali. ![]() ![]() In a civilized society in the name of religion, activities which disturb old or infirm persons, students or children having their sleep in the early hours or during daytime or other persons carrying on other activities cannot be permitted.” SC in the case of Noise Pollution (V), In re, (2005) 5 SCC 733 (this case has since been reopened) has held as under: “150. It said, “Undisputedly, no religion prescribes that prayers should be performed by disturbing the peace of others nor does it preach that they should be through voice amplifiers or beating of drums. ![]() Majestic Colony Welfare Assn, 2000CriLJ4022, The Supreme Court held that the Court may issue directions in respect of controlling noise pollution, even if such noise was a direct result of and was connected with religious activities. Stay tuned for all the latest updates on Ram Mandir! Click hereĭuring the case of Church of God (Full Gospel) in India v.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |